https://bit.ly/3KxVuo7 https://bit.ly/3KpJTaC https://bit.ly/3A70rPO https://bit.ly/3AbYtgQ https://bit.ly/3FG2I5s https://bit.ly/3nC7bjA https://bit.ly/3nxzKP6 https://bit.ly/3tDWQaQ https://bit.ly/3Iap2pu https://bit.ly/33IU1u0 https://bit.ly/3FF1abS https://bit.ly/3GHeAp8 https://bit.ly/3Ik3C9L https://bit.ly/3FCrqUj https://bit.ly/3rro7dG https://bit.ly/3qBYasz -Kenny Chesney by Otter on 2005 Jul 25 - 14:52 | reply to this comment Opening Pandora's Box What a wonderful discussion, I agree with Sarah’s (OP) as well as Steve’s (ACTIVE) insight. by Robert and Nan on 2005 Jul 26 - 06:57 | reply to this comment missionary position Dear Otter, (now, is it mink or otter? :-)), We have it very much the way you describe your love life. Wrestling for power (getting close to rape at times) is a lovely game for us, too. Yes, variation is very very important for us, we are both very active and dynamic people and we like to apply our powers in job, community and partnership. We like change, experiment a lot. Laugh about funny stuff happening, are sometimes amazed at new feelings and experiences coming up. Resistance certainly is a great booster for our energies, but also allowing ourselves to be very quiet and slow, almost spiritual feels great. But my wife will always eventually end up enjoying being taken, seeking the joy of letting go, being under my power. But definitely not only in those positions discussed. Anything is game. But I agree with Sarah that those positions are especially intense as far as setting up a difference in power status. william by william on 2005 Jul 26 - 19:41 | reply to this comment Missionary position I think there is nothing nicer. However, we do like to try other positions from time to time, though never 69. by advoca on 2005 Jul 27 - 23:35 | reply to this comment Forget the position...who's in control? While we normally use "male dominant" positions also, I can tell you that regardless of what is going on at any given moment, HE is in charge. Our lovemaking is a complex dance in which he leads, and I (very) enthusiastically follow. I have to comment on this statement from the original article: